NYSORVA Position Statement

NYSORVA POSITION STATEMENT— March 8, 2004

WHAT THE GOVERNOR'S ATV PROPOSAL WITHIN THE STATE BUDGET MEANS TO TRAIL RIDERS

INTRODUCTION:

We feel that on the whole, the Governor's Executive Budget proposal as detailed below is fairly well balanced in recognizing the ATV and Trail Motorcycling community. However, the proposed registration fee increase, from $10 to $45, has gotten a lot of people upset— the amount and mix of spending of the fee increase must be adjusted. If we can improve the funding aspects of the proposal, then we will be getting somewhere.

In other words: As written, the Proposal as it relates to the future of ATV & off-highway motorcycle ("OHM") recreation in NY, has some very positive aspects indeed. But it does have its faults, and this means it is a job for all of us to make sure that the Assembly & Senate counter-proposals improve on this good start.

SUPPORT AN IMPROVED PROPOSAL:

We urge you to support the positive aspects of the Governor’s Proposal. But you should strenuously call for significant changes to the funding model, detailed later in this document. Your State Senator and Assembly Member need to hear from you NOW about these funding details!
If you need help in contacting your elected officials see
http://www.nysorva.org/Legislation.htm or contact your local club president for guidance.

If the Executive Budget as written by the Governor was passed today with the ATV Proposal intact, the following would occur:

THE GOOD:

1) ATV recreation would be recognized, as a point of law, as a LEGITIMATE form of recreation by New York State (currently, we essentially "don't exist" in the Laws and programs of NY State, thus there has been no accommodation to date).

2) By Law, ATV ACCESS and trail building could be authorized (but not required) on state reforestation areas (areas of state-owned lands managed for resource extraction and intensive recreation) and State Recreational Easement lands (e.g., the former Champion lands in the Adirondack region).

3) FUNDING would be provided to a program under DEC that would direct and manage sustainable ATV recreation. Grants would be made for development and maintenance of trails on private land and state-owned recreational easements, for safety education, and for law enforcement. (See the following for a discussion of the flaws in this part of the proposal.)

THE BAD (Could be fixed with your help):

1) The proposal for the funding stream is by annual budget appropriation from the General Fund, not directly from annual registrations. This is highly flawed because we would have to ask for new funding to be included in the State Budget every year. Instead, a dedicated fund should be set up and its funding must come directly and automatically from annual registration fees, exactly the same way as snowmobile registrations currently fund the State Snowmobile Trail Fund.

2) As proposed, the vast majority of the $35 fee registration fee increase (to a total of $45/year) is intended for completely-unrelated expenses of the government. Only $850K, or 11% of projected revenue from the registration fee increase is proposed to be returned to the ATV community. The projected $5.8M of General Fund revenue from the increase is intended to cover the $3.3M in relief to towns that lost revenue under a tax break for large forest landowners; the rest is gravy for other programs. We assert that the entire $35 increase should go to ATV trails, education, and enforcement, leaving the State with $10 for the General Fund. This would be consistent with the Governor’s proposal to increase snowmobile registration fees to $45, $10 of which would go to the State General Fund.

THE INDIFFERENT:

The proposal would specify in law what is — by state policy and court decisions — already a de-facto "ATV ban" on access to state-owned lands within the Adirondack and Catskill Parks (aka "Forest Preserve" lands). Those of you inside the Adirondack and Catskill Parks are keenly aware that there is very little access allowed today to the vast state-owned Forest Preserves (2.9 million acres and growing). Thus, the ban does not take much away, even as far as roads are concerned. We lament that in order to remedy this situation, it would require no less than changes to the Constitution, the Law creating the Forest Preserve and the APA, and DEC State Land Master Plans, or a revolutionary re-interpretation by the Courts of all such documents.

This analysis was provided by:
New York State Off-Highway Recreational Vehicle Assn., Inc.
http://www.nysorva.org/Legislation.htm
http://www.nyatvsafety.net/


 

ATV Registration Renewal Moratorium

It has come to the attention of NYSORVA that the NYS Department of Motor Vehicles has made a decision to freeze current ATV registrations until the State Budget issue is resolved (recall the proposal to raise registration from $10/yr. to $45/yr and change the annual term start/end date to September 1, see http://www.nysorva.org/Legislation.htm).

The facts as dictated to us on March 8, 2004 by DMV programs administration personal in Albany are:

-> DMV is about to mail a letter to every registrant and all police agencies stating much of the following information.

-> Until the budget issue with relation to ATV registration fees is resolved, DMV has placed a moratorium on processing ATV registration renewals, either by mail or in person at DMV offices. (The computer system at DMV offices will block the completion of an in-person renewal transaction, as verified by a member.)

-> At this time, all current ATV registrations effective through April 30, 2004 will be extended from that lapse date to August 31, 2004. This means no double-renewal in 2004 (could have been $55 total for the year) as our legislative analyst had feared might happen. (No contingency was discussed for the case where the Budget is not passed by 8/31/04)

-> New registrations should still be accepted at this time. However we were unable to get a definitive answer whether new registrations after April 30 2004 would be expected to renew by September 1, 2004 (presuming the proposed increase is made law by then) or would be extended to August 31, 2005 due to "short changing" effect of the shift in the start-end term of the registration year proposed in the State Budget bill.

-> If the Budget passes with the proposal to increase the fee and change the annual registration term dates, a renewal invitation will be mailed reflecting the new fee. This would presumably occur prior to the August 31, 2004 lapse date if the Budget is passed relatively early.

-> If the Budget passes WITHOUT any provision for fee increase or change of the annual registration term dates, a renewal invitation reflecting the old $10 fee and term will be issued shortly after, that will be for the retroactive term of May 1, 2004 through April 30, 2005.

 

Sample Letter for Writing to Your Senators and Assembly Members

Copy this letter or create a version in your own words (exclude these instructions!) For clubs, distribute two copies to each of your members, one-each to be addressed to the members' local Senator, and to the members' local Assembly Member. Use the http://www.vote-smart.org/ link to determine the correct address to fill in. Each letter should be signed at the bottom with the name, address, and phone number of the sender printed below the signature. Letters without return addresses are thrown away! Each letter should be individually mailed in hand-addresses envelopes for best results.

The Honorable Sen. ___________________
New York State Senate
#____ Legislative Office Bldg [or #____ Capitol]
Albany, NY 12247

The Honorable Rep. ___________________
New York State Assembly
#____ Legislative Office Bldg [or #____ Capitol]
Albany, NY 12248


RE: 2004 ATV Trail Program & Funding Proposal

Dear [Senator ___________] or [Assemblyman ____________],

I am an ATV/trail bike rider and a voter in your district and want to bring to your attention the matter of Legislation that I would like you to support. The Executive Budget calls for the direction of a portion of each ATV registration fee collected by DMV to a trail fund and provides that cities, towns, villages, counties, and organizations may apply for monies from the fund for the development and maintenance of all terrain vehicle trails and facilities in the various counties of the state. DEC would be directed to run the program to address our needs while protecting the environment.

Specifically I ask that you promote a dedicated funding account instead of an appropriation. Furthermore, the split of the new $45 registration fee must be made more equitable in par with the registration fee split proposed for snowmobilers in the Budget. Addressing these two matters in the final State Budget will make a good proposal great and ensure the ATV Program’s effectiveness in getting the job done. Any less funding or the Legislature’s failure to annually renew the funding would result in the program falling short of everyone’s expectations.

So that I may have a legal place to ride my ATV or trail bike, a trail program and fund is needed to support ATV trail development and maintenance. By directing funding to private/easement and municipal lands, State lands are protected. And for clubs trying to develop trails on private land, where most of the trail should go, they face a difficult funding problem without passage of this law. This proposal would establish a program and funding mechanism analogous to the very successful snowmobile trail program that supports the vast network of official state trails. The State and ATV users like me will benefit much in the same ways as we have with the snowmobile trail fund.

Thank you for your kind consideration of this matter.

Sincerely,

[your signature here]

[Your name printed here]
[Your address]
[Your phone number]

- -
Please visit
http://www.nysorva.org for more information.